"Mike A. Harris" <mharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Is there a reason not to leave such bugs in NEEDINFO state forever? > Yes. Then there are 100000 bugs open forever, that will never > be addressed. Fair enough. What about adding a resolution category "closed for lack of information", which we could use if something stays in NEEDINFO too long? Or I suppose we could use WORKSFORME ... regards, tom lane
