On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:24:30PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > I don't think it should be DEFERRED but rather CURRENTRELEASE. DEFERRED > implies that the bug intends to be revisited later, which is not the > case. They were given a chance to change the bug from FC2 to a newer > release and NEEDINFO status. If they haven't responded by now just > assume it is fixed, and tell them about changing the Version and > reopening if not. Many of these *aren't* fixed in the current release, though. They're feature requests that were rejected or ignored, non-reproducable one-time-glitches, various misunderstandings of the way things work, and yep, actual bugs that got dropped on the floor and aren't going to get addressed in reality. I think DEFERRED is the best option (given the description in bugzilla) given the mix of bugs -- many of them *are* actually gonna be real issues. The other alternative that makes sense is WONTFIX. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 73 degrees Fahrenheit.
