Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:05:43PM -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote:
Should the owners also change to a default fedora-legacy owner of some
sort? I don't really plan on dealing with the FC2 bugs I own.
Well, sort of the idea is that Fedora Legacy won't be either.
bugzilla.redhat.com tells me that a resolution of deferred means "The
problem described is a bug which will not be fixed in this version of the
product." I think that should convey exactly what you just said. :)
As before, I'll include a short message explaining what's going on.
I don't think it should be DEFERRED but rather CURRENTRELEASE. DEFERRED
implies that the bug intends to be revisited later, which is not the
case. They were given a chance to change the bug from FC2 to a newer
release and NEEDINFO status. If they haven't responded by now just
assume it is fixed, and tell them about changing the Version and
reopening if not.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
