Re: The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:30:31PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> WONTFIX is more truthful then.  DEFERRED is a really bad and confusing 
> state IMHO.  Could you post a draft of the accompanying closing message 
> here before doing so?

WONTFIX just sounded so harsh. BUt yeah, I'll definitely post a draft
message, and as before I'll make sure I'm on the CC list of all of the bugs
so I can deal with any resulting messes. Not that I anticipate any this time
around -- the whole experiment has gone pretty well, as we're down to about
500 NEEDINFO bugs, from over 1000 open bugs before. (Unfortunately I didn't
count how many were already in NEEDINFO state.)

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 73 degrees Fahrenheit.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux