Re: The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Lane wrote:
Miloslav Trmac <mitr@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:38:36AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:

Setting status to "CURRENTRELEASE", however if you still
experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora
Core release and are still interested in Red Hat tracking
the issue, and assisting in troubleshooting the problem,
please feel free to provide the information requested above,
and reopen the report.


This is also abusing the bugzilla resolution status; if somebody
looks for a bug he is experiencing and finds it, he sees
"CURRENTRELEASE" when in fact it is "WE-WISH-IT-WERE-CURRENTRELEASE".
NOTABUG nor WONTFIX is perfect, but either provides more correct
information than CURRENTRELEASE.


Is there a reason not to leave such bugs in NEEDINFO state forever?

Yes.  Then there are 100000 bugs open forever, that will never
be addressed.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux