Re: The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 03:38 -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
[snip]

> When someone doesn't respond, I have a preference for using,
> CURRENTRELEASE, RAWHIDE, NEXTRELEASE, or ERRATA resolutions
> using a comment of the nature:
> 
> 
> "The information we've requested above is required in order
>   to review this problem report further and diagnose/fix the
>   issue if it is still present.  Since there haven't been any
>   updates to the report in quite a long time now after we've
>   requested additional information, we're assuming the problem
>   is either no longer present in our current OS release, or
>   that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem.
> 
>   Setting status to "CURRENTRELEASE", however if you still
>   experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora
>   Core release and are still interested in Red Hat tracking
>   the issue, and assisting in troubleshooting the problem,
>   please feel free to provide the information requested above,
>   and reopen the report.
> 
>   Thanks in advance."
> 

I went ahead and added the above text to this wiki page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StockBugzillaResponses

If anyone's got ideas for further improvements to that page, they'd be
most welcome.

[snip]



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux