On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 11:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I dont think legacy is going to be using the build system as much as > core and extras. It might be better to use a common pool of build > systems separated by access time or build cycles rather than a physical > allocation of individual build systems. In other words, does the current > model of separation serve any real purpose other than being > theoretically more clean? More clean. It allows us to make modifications to plague/mock that are necessary for Legacy w/out interrupting what Extras is doing or using. Sure our patches would go upstream, but it shouldn't be necessary to interrupt the Extras system to make a change for the Legacy systems. Core doesn't use these systems so that is a completely different ball of wax (that doesn't need to be discussed here) -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
