Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:

On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So perhaps an obvious question is could Red Hat internal build systems used by Fedora Core or the ones used for Fedora Extras be spared a few cycles for Fedora legacy on x86_64/PPC or do you want to keep the infrastructure independent?. If we are waiting for the community to donate time, money or resources to the project we need to list what exactly is required for them to participate. While the QA procedures for example are documented, the requirement for a PPC system is not. The website needs a highlighted list of such documentation.

When I brought up the thought of using the Extras build system for doing
Legacy updates, it was turned down and requested that we use our own
infrastructure.  Honestly I don't remember the reasons behind this, but
I think a lot of it was we're still carrying around content for RHL.
Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more precisely.

As far as money/resources, this is actually something I'm looking to Red
Hat for.  Red Hat wants the Fedora project to continue to grow, and
Legacy is part of that project.  I'm waiting for after FC5 is released
so that we have some cycles for other project tasks, such as getting a
copy of the CVS trees for our use and a few other things.  At that time
I'd like to talk to them about some infrastructure, or revisit the idea
of using Extras infrastructure for Legacy building and publishing.

I think we need to start sharing all the infrastructure more commonly within the various sub projects. Fedora directory server for example is using their own wiki for some odd reason (http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Main_Page). The infrastructure pieces can be part of Red Hat or external to it but if there is already something available for Fedora Core or Extras, we need to take advantage of that. I dont understand the reluctance in doing this.


--
Rahul


--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux