Re: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC 
> systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we 
> share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be 
> happening. This is not about shoving anything but tapping into the 
> resources available till we can separate it more in the future if thats 
> desirable.
> 

This 'donation' could come from Red Hat, much like the Extras systems
came from Red Hat.  The thing is we want separation now, so rather than
get settled into a system and then move out later, we'd rather do it
right to begin with.  Some of the resources can be shared, such as a
repo of all the Fedora packages to pull from on a high speed link.  So
think of it as adding a couple more systems into the existing
infrastructure and just tagging them for use by Legacy.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux