Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy
to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion
happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more
precisely.
Again, I'm not quite sure what it was. I just don't remember. I think
it was discussed during a Fedora board meeting. I could ask the board
if they remembered or if minutes were taken.
Ya. It would be good to see an yes or no along with the details so that
we understand better where the bottle neck is if any.
So as far as Legacy goes, we're using the Fedora wiki, we're considering
collapsing all of our website into the Wiki, we're moving to use the
same software as Extras, moving to get our repo data in Core directly,
send announcements via fedora-announce, etc... If our systems are in
the same place as Extras systems, and Fedora Sysadmins have access to
them as well, and we share of the publish space, is that not
integration? I don't think we need to shove other projects onto the
same systems that do Extras builds.
The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC
systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we
share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be
happening. This is not about shoving anything but tapping into the
resources available till we can separate it more in the future if thats
desirable.
--
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
