Re: changes are still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 08:43:41AM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> >>As stated above, I don't think we should recommend (or even allow) the
> >>package creator doing QA for his/her own packages.  That's the other
> >>people's job, and ensures the logical separation of functions.
> >
> >But historically we have allowed this, and no one has yet approved a
> >change to that.
> 
> Has this ever occurred?  I have not seen a single instance of package 
> creator doing a PUBLISH or VERIFY during the time I've been active in 
> the project (like 7-8 months or so).

A handful of packages have gone straight to update-testing without a
separate PUBLISH when built by myself or Marc.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux