У čet, 02. 06. 2005. у 13:44 -0500, Eric Rostetter написа: > If people are using testing-updates and not reporting their success, > then that is the issue, and that is what needs to be fixed. I'm not > sure if this is the case. If it is, maybe we could make posting a > success report easier (e.g. a web form they fill out?) I think this is a good idea. I recognize myself here, sadly. Anyway, VERIFY+ on all updates-testing packages for rh9 from me (except /etc/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/default-modules.conf issue I reported to John Dalbec, and that was from updates folder; but, maybe that was just me, since I haven't received the reply). I am using them with four-five days delay from the date of their original posting, and have found no problems. -- Igor Nestorović Home Page: http://jung.ekof.bg.ac.yu ICQ UIN: 31079000
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: =?iso-8859-5?Q?=BE=D2=DE?= =?iso-8859-5?Q?_=F8=D5?= =?iso-8859-5?Q?_=D4=D5=DE?= =?iso-8859-5?Q?_=DF=DE=E0=E3=DA=D5?= =?iso-8859-5?Q?_=E1=D0?= =?iso-8859-5?Q?_=D4=D8=D3=D8=E2=D0=DB=DD=D8=DC?= =?iso-8859-5?Q?_=DF=DE=E2=DF=D8=E1=DE=DC?=
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
