Re: changes are still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Eric Rostetter wrote:
As stated above, I don't think we should recommend (or even allow) the
package creator doing QA for his/her own packages.  That's the other
people's job, and ensures the logical separation of functions.

But historically we have allowed this, and no one has yet approved a
change to that.

Has this ever occurred? I have not seen a single instance of package creator doing a PUBLISH or VERIFY during the time I've been active in the project (like 7-8 months or so).

But never mind. Maybe Warren and others had higher hopes for the participation enthusiasm which just didn't materialize to that degree for many reasons (like being too difficult to participate). If we don't manage to get updates out, we'd be better dead.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux