OK, almost a week has passed since the last message on this thread. I
think we need to decide what to do.
Specific suggestions?
I've seen at least the following proposals:
1) 1 VERIFY vote needed (for any version), after that packages are
published after 2 weeks of timeout unless needswork/discuss or issues
are identified.
2) 2 VERIFY votes are needed (for any version), after that packages
are published after 2 weeks of timeout unless needswork/discuss or
issues are identified.
a) timeout is counted from the first VERIFY
b) timeout is counted from the second VERIFY
3) 2 VERIFY votes are needed (for any version), after that packages
are published after at most 4 weeks of timeout after the first verify,
but two weeks after the second, unless needswork/discuss or issues are
identified.
4) 2 VERIFY votes are needed (for any version), after that packages
are published after 4 weeks of timeout unless needswork/discuss or
issues are identified.
1) or 2) are OK by me. I could also live with 3) but I think it's
overly complex. 4) does not seem like a sufficient change.
Let's have the opinions by Monday, and make the decision then? We
can't stall anymore.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
