Request for clarification: what _timeout_ are we talking about here?
The earlier documentation had some timeouts for RHL72/RHL73 and
RHL8/RHL9 but those no longer apply.
Are we just talking about the time at maximum which it should take
from getting a VERIFY vote to ensuring Status whiteboard has been
updated? I don't think that could be called a timeout..
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 13:44 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
I'm not against the timeout, in fact there is supposed to be a timeout
in the process, though I don't remember what it is. Perhaps we need to
revisit the timeout issue, with the goal of putting someone in charge of
watching the packages for timeout conditions. Right now, no one is AFAIK
watching for such situations, so even if something had multiple verify votes
and has stalled, no one notices and pushes it out. Seems like another
essential job waiting to be filled.
I agree to the timeout. Let's decide on this list what that timeout
should be and I'll watch for it.
[in later mails the agreement seemed to be that 2 weeks was OK]
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
