Re: changes are still needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 21:16 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> It's a bit complex, and if the "server guys" are interested in higher 
> QA, I'm sure they will participate more actively in QA'ing the server 
> packages :)

I *DO*  Q&A the RH73 server packages, the problem is they are still held
up by the lack of interest in FC1, RH9, etc.

I *DO NOT* do Q&A on packages I have no interest (and/or knowledge) in,
nor do I expect anyone else to.  We are not doing Q&A for CUA reasons.
We are doing Q&A for security and stability reasons. Therefore I think
it is foolish to keep asking people unfamiliar with an application (not
to mention the bug/flaw/fix) to do Q&A on said application. 

-Jim P.



--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux