On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 23:33 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 07:34 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >> OK, almost a week has passed since the last message on this thread. I
> >> think we need to decide what to do.
> >>
> >> Specific suggestions?
> >
> > How about 2 Verifies for core/server packages and 1 Verify for
> > everything else? Also, only 1 Verify would be needed for a core/server
> > package that is being re-released within a 3 month period.
>
> How do you define 'core/server packages'?
1) any mandatory (based on rpm dependencies) package
(i.e. krb5-libs, inetd, vi)
2) any package that opens an external port <= 1024 by default
(i.e. apache, named/bind9, openssh, etc)
3) any package that potentially listens on an external port <= 1024
(telnet-server, wsftp, etc)
4) any package that is used for non-gui server administration
(i.e. nslookup, dig, tcpdump, etc).
5) any package that is a dependency of any of the above
(i.e. openssl, etc)
-Jim P.
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
