On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 14:04 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: > Quoting Jim Popovitch <jimpop@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 12:46 -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > > > I think if more rigorous guidelines and procedures are what you're > > > looking for, clearly FL is not adequate for your needs and you should be > > > looking elsewhere. > > > > Is that the image/statement that FL really truly believes in? If so, > > put it up on the main page of the website. > > I refuse to put on the web page "Fedora Legacy does not meet the needs > of Jim Popovitch." LOL! For the most part FL does meet my needs. In fact, the current contributors do a LOT to assist people, like me, who need some prodding and/or assistance as well. What I want to do is find a way to improve this and avoid any repetition in the release cycle so that updates are pushed out faster than expected. -Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
