On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 08:50 -0500, Eric Wood wrote: > I just think the version is artificially being kept down cause I don't > see > any substatial diff in the code except for tab indents. 'substantial' diff? I'm sorry, I don't deal in substantial. If there is ANYTHING different other than the security patches we applied to the older rev, then there is not going to be an update. > I'm fine, I just argue the point that the buck stops at zlib and it > can > easily be kept up across all FC releases. Why should the buck START with zlib? If we do one, then we should do them all right? I'm sorry but this is a hard line I have to draw. We have a hard enough time keeping up with security backports we don't want to add the burdon of upgrading everybody's pet package. If you care THAT much about it, nothing is stopping you from setting up your own repository. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
