Rex Dieter wrote: > Due to silliness of trying different configurations over time, both of > those mirrorlist solutions are supported and should work exactly the same > (the mirrorlist files should link to identical content... essentially). OK, thanks. I suppose it's possible that the repo is getting so popular that they are all timing out since a few weeks ;-) Another question I have is about the relationship to the different repos. Firstly, there's Fedora updates and updates-testing. They seem to be clear to understand. At one time, users who wanted an early taste would go to kde-redhat and enable the kde-redhat-testing and kde-redhat- unstable repos. I have followed this method for years. Since some months or so, it seems to me that things are ending up in Fedora updates-testing even before they end up in kde-redhat. So, Iḿ confused about the hierarchy: where in the scheme of adventure and stability do these various repos fit? My system appears to be very standard and works with most updates with little problem and I like to get the testing packages before they land in Fedora updates. In the past, I never bothered with Fedora updates- testing|unstable, since kde-redhat appeared to be the early adopters' track... but no more? And now there is even the kde-sig copr repo! I have never used it. I don't have a clue where these all fit in, in the scheme of things. Does the kde-sig copr repo supercede kde-redhat? If I use kde-redhat, what will copr give me? _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx