Am 14.03.2016 um 18:45 schrieb P. Gueckel:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:How do you expect them to filter spam withoutscanning your messages? Good point. Scanning is a privacy breach that likely violates privacy legislation. All the more reason to disable the feature and do your own scanning
*lol*we have days where 500000 mails for a few hundret users are rejected straight ahead by postscreen-scoring on the MTA long before content-filters become a topic
have fun receive that all, scan it local and what about false positives you overlook - on our MX servers *any* message above 8.0 socre points is rejected unconditionally, so a sane sender generates *it's own bounce* to his enduser and nothing is silently dropped
between 5.5 and 7.9 points it get tagged *but not* moved somwehere, just a SA header and a mark in the subject - the user is responsible at it#s own how to handle such mails by headers and/or subject
8-10% of all mails not rejected straight away because bad reputation based ona mix of 50 combined dnsbl/ndswl are rejcted by milter
have fun doing that local where you *must not* reject and backscatter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
