Reindl Harald wrote: > there is no trustworthy at all unless a mail is encrypted and honestly > in case of security i would trust Google much more than a random ISP I know what you're saying. My ISP is the telephone company, so it's not exactly random, but I know what you mein. I wish encrypted mail were the standard, but, even if I tried to instigate it, it would only be more secure if both ends were encrypting (there's is also electronic communication within the office, which might not be encrypted, etc). Could electronic mail ever be completely secure, so that one could _know_ that no quotes or portions could ever be shared without one's consent? I believe it was once said that Google scans emails for keywords &c. I just don't like the idea of my financial statements and 'serious' correspondence being scanned for keywords and having this information added to my profile---that could well be commodified and sold. > hence we have our own mailservers and offer also mailservice and > spamfiltering on own inhouse infrastructure to customers which want to > be sure that all data never touchs any 3rd party except the nomal > mailflow from the sender to the MX I wish I could do that, but it's not worth the extra cost and headache for me as an individual. I used to have a domain that came with this service, but is the hosting company really more secure/trustworthy than my ISP? Doing it in-house is the best, for sure. _______________________________________________ kde mailing list kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
