Le Lun 27 février 2012 13:04, Akira TAGOH a écrit : >>>>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:28:26 +0100, >>>>>> "NM" == "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > NM> This won't work at rpm level because you need to export tuples > NM> (name,langage,priority) and rpm only understands monovalued properties > > No need to limit trying to find out the way for rpm only > because we are talking about the langpack plugin right? If you don't define rpm-friendly metadata, repoquery, yum and rpm won't work on your new keys (and I predict it'll be a major testing/QA/audit problem if the only testing app is anaconda) and you'll need to ship yum/rpm metadata anyway (so users can actually select packages), bloating indexes and slowing down yum. So I would advise against it. Also such a change requires cooperation of all font packagers, ie guidelines and FPC approval, so be careful not to spend too much time on a solution that can't be sold there. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
