>>>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:28:26 +0100, >>>>> "NM" == "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: NM> This won't work at rpm level because you need to export tuples NM> (name,langage,priority) and rpm only understands monovalued properties No need to limit trying to find out the way for rpm only because we are talking about the langpack plugin right? We could have another metadata to make it easy if it's really useful. anyway, the most important thing can be provided by Provides: fonts-<alias>-<lang> = <priority>. that should contains the enough information. if we set the higher version for the higher priority package like 1000 - the numeral prefix in the config file, rpm would automatically address the better fonts against the version I suppose? NM> You may try to hack around with font(:lang) = version but that requires some NM> serious thought to map fontconfig priorities to rpm versions (and what will NM> happen at upgrade time when a font is promoted/demoted)? me neither. guess the real version in the package would ensure for upgrading? dunno. or recommend to do yum distro-sync or even update might work? ;) NM> This is all a PITA that would be way more natural and less error-prone if NM> someone taught rpm to work with tuple properties. Because that's what fonts NM> metadata really requires NM> Regards, NM> -- NM> Nicolas Mailhot -- Akira TAGOH
Attachment:
pgpCuoNnl4_9w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
