On 08/19/2015 05:16 PM, langdon wrote: > > What about an Objective to understand if IoT is a thing for Fedora to > pursue? Maybe a shorter one, e.g. 6 months, with metrics like: > a) delivered and evaluated a survey of fedora comm members and interest > is n > b) what kind of changes would need to be made to infrastructure tooling? > c) what is the best model for such a pursuit: SiG, Edition, something else? This is sort of one of the things I have in mind when saying marketing should be an objective / more core to Fedora. Delivering the survey and looking at the "market" to see if IoT is a Thing (TM) that Fedora should pursue. > I suppose SiG could also do this, but, in my mind, a SiG is "we want to > pursue this interest, irrelevant of the interests of Fedora at large" > (which I mean *very* positively, despite the writing sounding negative). > I would think this Objective would be "Let's get Fedora to concentrate > on this subject, at large, because reasons" Yep. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/council-discuss The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
