On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:33:19PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 03:38:44PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > I'm wary of calling "this list and flock" sufficient for discussion of a > > proposal so broad in scope. Maybe the readership of this list is broader > > than I realized, but I worry about how much of the community this > > discussion has reached. Certainly it hasn't been hidden, but I suspect that > > the default assumption is that board-discuss is for board members to have > > public discussions. > > I've also posted about it several times on 5tFTW, including posts of that to > the users and devel lists, and to G+, Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter, all > mentioning important governance and leadership decisions in process. > > > > For what it's worth, I have no objections to the proposal itself, I just > > want to make sure we're reaching all of whatever we define as a member of > > the community. > > If people think it's a good idea, we could send a message to the announce > list, I guess. But I don't really think that'd help much over all of the > above. There will always be people missing things, but I don't think there is such thing as too much communication. So, I'm +1 on sending an email to announce@. In the worst case there will be no reaction but at least we'll be able to send link to the archives saying: look we did announce it and on multiple occasions and places. My 2cts, Pierre _______________________________________________ board-discuss mailing list board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss
