On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:43 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/22/2013 02:58 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> >> On 05/22/2013 09:49 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >>> >>> Maybe they will throw darts at the project wiki and change that too and >>> starts to execute community members by a role of dice for that matter. >> >> >> Conspiracy theories about fedora governance groups doing exactly the >> opposite of what their charter and documented purpose is? >> >> This is getting a bit silly... now that you're just making stuff up. > > . > Indeed but atleast it is not I that lack the trust in the community and gave > the CWG the ability to throw darts at fas to pick up it's members instead of > having the community elect for those it trusts do that job. > > I just pointed out stupidly what it might lead to. Groups can and do set their own policies regarding succession. Some choose to have elections, some choose other methods. Whether one group chooses elections and another group chooses some other mechanism is not obviously related to trusting the community. If you are a good QA person and you are willing to do QA work you don't need to be elected by the community. We still trust you even though you weren't. In the same way if someone is good at mediation there is no reason that person needs to be elected to do mediation. John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
