|
On 05/22/2013 09:50 AM, Ankur Sinha
wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 07:58 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:Interesting to see an matter that have been delegate to CWG from the board to handle, being thrown back to the board to resolve.This isn't what happened here. Really The mail I sent was to confirm if the Board had made a decision to implement the ban on their *private* mailing list. They replied saying they hadn't. "Hi guys, Has the board taken a decision on this yet? We discussed this over at the cwg private ml and decided that it'll be better to wait for the board to make a decision and then act accordingly. " There is absolutely nothing indicating the boards private mailing list in your respond. "If he's been banned, there's isn't anything for the cwg to do. If he's been given another chance, maybe the CWG could talk to him one *last* time, request him to *always* keep things civil or risk a *permanent* ban from Fedora MLs. " Here you are asking if he has been banned and stating that no further action need to be taken by the CWG if it is so. Then you state if he's been given a second then maybe cwg should talk to him one last time.. Anyway I want to know exactly why the board *chose* those individuals to serve on behalf of the community ( which arguably should be selected by the community since the board itself is not entirely elected and even if it was it still arguably should be members from the community who decide which individuals from the community handle these delegate matters ) . And the answer to the question why members of the CWG cant be listed. JBG |
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
