Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 19:07 -0500 schrieb Brian Pepple: > On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Wrong. As mentioned in my very first email in this thread and further > > explained by JÃrg, FAMSCo's trac is *not* private. It is open to > > submission by all FAS account holders and people can see their own > > tickets. I have said that this would be a suitable solution for me, > > although I'd like to see more transparency if possible. > > I don't think your correct on this point. Joerg wrote the following > earlier in this thread: > > we also decided not to open the FAmSCo Trac Instance, because we > came to the conclusion that we can not expose private/personal > information out of our tickets > > But we made really good experiences to allow authenticated Users > create new tickets and let them follow up only their own tickets > > Which is where I believe Jesse got his information. I don't think I'm wrong here, perhaps Jesse and me have a different understanding of the word 'private'. In my very first email I explained that I am fine with the level of privacy that FAMSCo has. I never demanded trac to be world-readable but I wanted it to be open to Fedora project contributors in order to bring something up to the board's attention. Regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
