Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 10:32 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating: > On 1/11/11 10:29 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 11.01.2011, 10:07 -0800 schrieb Jesse Keating: > >> On 1/11/11 9:33 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > >>> All these questions could be answered by looking at a single ticket > >>> easily. > >>> > >>> Last but not I think that an issue tracker encourages people to work on > >>> the issues more focused and constructive while a mailing list leads them > >>> to state their personal opinions or even rants and flames. (Yes, I know > >>> I'm guilty as charged here) > >> > >> Simple solution. Make a wiki page for your proposal. Ensure that all > >> relevant updates go to the wiki page. > > > > Ok, say I create a new wiki page for $proposal, how can I be sure it > > ends up on the meeting agenda? How can I make sure they keep track of > > updates? > > > > I don't understand why a workflow that most groups in Fedora are using > > should not work for the board. > > > > Because most groups aren't dealing with issues that require high levels > of privacy. I feel like the work of the board requires more transparency and privacy is just a lame excuse for not working properly with the community in many aspects. > The other group that does also went with a closed Trac. And that group is? Regards, Christoph _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
