On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 00:58 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Wrong. As mentioned in my very first email in this thread and further
> explained by JÃrg, FAMSCo's trac is *not* private. It is open to
> submission by all FAS account holders and people can see their own
> tickets. I have said that this would be a suitable solution for me,
> although I'd like to see more transparency if possible.
I don't think your correct on this point. Joerg wrote the following
earlier in this thread:
we also decided not to open the FAmSCo Trac Instance, because we
came to the conclusion that we can not expose private/personal
information out of our tickets
But we made really good experiences to allow authenticated Users
create new tickets and let them follow up only their own tickets
Which is where I believe Jesse got his information.
Later,
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
