On 1/11/11 3:58 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > I think I gave enough examples in another mail >> > Repeating the same arguments over and over also does not make them true. >>>>> > >> > The other group that does also went with a closed Trac. >>> > > And that group is? >> > >> > FAmSCo, as noted in this very thread. > Wrong. As mentioned in my very first email in this thread and further > explained by JÃrg, FAMSCo's trac is *not* private. It is open to > submission by all FAS account holders and people can see their own > tickets. I have said that this would be a suitable solution for me, > although I'd like to see more transparency if possible. > Now you're just splitting hairs. Jeorg's mail says that they did not open the Trac instance. This is what I was referring to. Making the adjustments to the Trac config that Jeorg suggested is indeed an improvement, but it is not "open", as you seem to be pushing for. Nor does it operate like any other project. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
