On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 02:41 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > Am Montag, den 06.12.2010, 18:16 -0600 schrieb Mike McGrath: > > > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am Samstag, den 04.12.2010, 22:37 -0500 schrieb Greg DeKoenigsberg: > > > > > > > > > > > > Spins folks: what steps would *you* be satisfied with? Come with > > > > > > proposals. > > > > > > > > > > I think I already mentioned some things a couple of times in this > > > > > thread: > > > > > * Allow the spins to define their own target audience. > > > > > * Allow the spins to ship the software they need for their use > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > Another way to word this is "Let all spins fork Fedora and then let them > > > > continue to use the Fedora name" > > > > > > Hi Mike > > > > > > why do you think it's forking? > > > > I think Mike was working on the assumption that you were asking for > > spins to be allowed to include any packages they like (including ones > > that don't meet Fedora's guidelines); I think that wasn't actually so > > clear and probably isn't what you meant, but it might be best to > > clarify: what exactly do you mean by 'allow the spins to ship the > > software they need for their use case', and in what way is this not > > currently the case? > > > > I was also thinking he might want a different version of bash for every > spin. That just seems like a fork to me. > I should also make clear I'm not using fork as a pejorative here. -mIKE _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
