Re: Request: please consider clarifying the project's position on Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Samstag, den 04.12.2010, 22:37 -0500 schrieb Greg DeKoenigsberg:
>
> Spins folks: what steps would *you* be satisfied with?  Come with
> proposals.

I think I already mentioned some things a couple of times in this
thread:
      * Allow the spins to define their own target audience.
      * Allow the spins to ship the software they need for their use
        case.
      * Do not block spins or alike with the TLA. 
      * Give the spins some more (I'm not saying equal) support when it
        comes to resources that are shared among all groups.
      * Make sure groups don't make progress on the account of others.
        It is not acceptable if one group continuously makes a change
        that breaks several other spins/programs/desktops.
      * Allow the Desktop Live-CD to be called "GNOME Live-CD" or
        similar in some contexts. I'm not saying that we should get rid
        of GNOME as the default selection and I think the download
        options are already very good designed, but in some contexts it
        must be allowed to call GNOME GNOME, e.g. in the boot menu for
        the multi desktop DVD. The sleeves of the Live-CD should mention
        it is GNOME because the term "Desktop Live Media" is the #1 FAQ
        on events.
      * When it comes to decision making, make the decisions in time.
      * Listen to the spin community or the community in general and
        consult them before making decisions.

I think these were a good start.

Regards,
Christoph

_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux