On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:10 AM, seth vidal wrote:
When I was a Fedora board member talking about merging Fedora Core and Fedora Extras/ reducing Fedora Core to a minimal level or having a published roadmap with a list of features or pushing for the majority being elected rather than appointed, several people told me the same thing. Things do change, even if it takes time. I don't think we have any disagreement that it is a good thing if we lose that veto power and I am glad about that.
Rahul
Good luck with that windmill.
I'm off to do things that have a snowballs chance in hell of actually
helping someone and getting finished.
When I was a Fedora board member talking about merging Fedora Core and Fedora Extras/ reducing Fedora Core to a minimal level or having a published roadmap with a list of features or pushing for the majority being elected rather than appointed, several people told me the same thing. Things do change, even if it takes time. I don't think we have any disagreement that it is a good thing if we lose that veto power and I am glad about that.
Rahul
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
