On 08/17/2010 01:37 AM, seth vidal wrote: >> Lose the veto power entirely and you have much less of that risk. >> FESCo doesn't have a single person with a veto power and we are relying >> on a fully elected group and things are moving along just fine. If the >> board works on a consensus model just like now but without the veto >> power, would things really be that different? > I can think of a couple of situations where it would be. > > Remember 'The INCIDENT'? If you are talking about the security incident, I don't think we have anything to be proud of. You will have to expand on how any veto power was used for a good purpose by the FPL in this case. My opinion is that we have no good history of that. Rahul _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
