On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 01:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/17/2010 01:37 AM, seth vidal wrote: > >> Lose the veto power entirely and you have much less of that risk. > >> FESCo doesn't have a single person with a veto power and we are relying > >> on a fully elected group and things are moving along just fine. If the > >> board works on a consensus model just like now but without the veto > >> power, would things really be that different? > > I can think of a couple of situations where it would be. > > > > Remember 'The INCIDENT'? > > If you are talking about the security incident, I don't think we have > anything to be proud of. I wasn't saying to be proud of - just saying it would be different. which is what you asked. -sv _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
