On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
----
I was talking about vendors and volunteers. I am not sure you picked up vendors and left out volunteers. I am talking about a governance model that doesn't give a single vendor any veto power. It is not merely hypothetical that losing that power is healthier for Fedora.
Rahul
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:No. im not going to assume. I very specifically want vendors to speak
> Let us assume for a moment that there are no other vendors in the entire
> Fedora community except for Red Hat. Would you want to facilitate that
> by providing a opportunity to participate in a equivalent footing?
up for themselves in any discussion about the balance of control from
their pov. I'm not at all keen on talking hypothetical about another
pov with hypothetical strawmen arguments.
----
I was talking about vendors and volunteers. I am not sure you picked up vendors and left out volunteers. I am talking about a governance model that doesn't give a single vendor any veto power. It is not merely hypothetical that losing that power is healthier for Fedora.
Rahul
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
