On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was talking about vendors and volunteers. I am not sure you picked up > vendors and left out volunteers. I am talking about a governance model that > doesn't give a single vendor any veto power. It is not merely hypothetical > that losing that power is healthier for Fedora. Since I am a volunteer I don't have to hear from that group..I can just talk to myself to get at least one non-representative sampling from a volunteer pov. And then I can just look here on this list for a number of other differing opinions from a volunteer pov. But vendors... vendors I haven't seen a representative of speaking from a vendor perspective. And just as I don't want a vendor to speak for me as a volunteer.. I don't want to see anyone make the mistake of speaking for a vendor. if there are vendor specific issue...then please..pretty please..vendors speak up. -jef _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
