On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/13/2010 10:35 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 07/09/2010 02:13 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>> To clear up a couple things that I saw questions on in this thread: >>> >>> * The existence of fedoracommunity.org is, in part, premised on >>> relieving our sponsor, Red Hat, of some risk. It's the same kind of >>> risk that requires our wiki to avoid giving out specific information >>> on the dreaded $ZOMG_CODECS. To paraphrase my discussions with Red >>> Hat Legal that led to our creating this domain, the very domain name >>> itself helps indicate that "the Fedora Project" (not an actual legal >>> entity, so it's fair to read this as "Red Hat," since Daddy >>> Shadowman assumes all our legal risks [thanks!]) is not responsible >>> for the content at a target site. >>> >> >> To be direct, If fedoracommunity.org wiki documents the steps to use RPM >> Fusion, is that ok according to Red Hat Legal? > > Red Hat does not control (or condone) the content of fedoracommunity.org. The more detailed answer is that as long as a fedoracommunity.org subdomain points to physical space not managed by the Fedora Project, this is not a problem. Paul _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
