On 07/09/2010 02:13 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > To clear up a couple things that I saw questions on in this thread: > > * The existence of fedoracommunity.org is, in part, premised on > relieving our sponsor, Red Hat, of some risk. It's the same kind of > risk that requires our wiki to avoid giving out specific information > on the dreaded $ZOMG_CODECS. To paraphrase my discussions with Red > Hat Legal that led to our creating this domain, the very domain name > itself helps indicate that "the Fedora Project" (not an actual legal > entity, so it's fair to read this as "Red Hat," since Daddy > Shadowman assumes all our legal risks [thanks!]) is not responsible > for the content at a target site. > To be direct, If fedoracommunity.org wiki documents the steps to use RPM Fusion, is that ok according to Red Hat Legal? Rahul _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
