On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 23:23 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 23:08 -0400, Chris Tyler wrote: > > Consider: we don't want someone from -- oh, let's say Canada -- showing > > up, realizing that there's neither a ca.fedoraproject.org nor a > > ca.fedoracommunity.org site, and concluding that there's no one involved > > with Fedora from her country (you can repeat the exercise with "us" or > > any other country code in place of "ca"). At the same time, I really, > > really don't want to create a new domain just to "solve" this problem. > > Is a domain beyond fedoracommunity.org and fedoraproject.org being > proposed by anyone? I'm not proposing that. > > ~m Sorry, I meant "domain" as in "subdomain": foo.fedora{community,project}.org I see three separate things here; let me sum them up from my POV-- - A discussion about whether foo.fedoracommunity.org should be permitted to point to fedoraproject.org/wiki/foo (the original question). The argument for this include making it easy to remember where local content can be found, the argument against this is that it loses the original meaning attached to fedoracommunity.org, that is, local community-run websites outside of the scope of the main Fedora project. My opinion is that this distinction is significant and should not be lost -- we should not point *.fedoracommunity.org to resources within the main fedoraproject.org space. - Paul pointed out during the discussion yesterday that it would also be possible to create foo.fedoraproject.org and have it point to a particular resource (e.g., wiki landing page). I don't know if this was an off-the-cuff observation that this is possible, or a serious proposal that we do it. The other possibility, I suppose, would be fedoraproject.org/foo, if the intention is simply to create short, memorable URLs. Personally, I don't consider these to be a great step forward from fedoraproject.org/wiki/foo. - The idea of a better index page to all of the localized and local resources is desirable, perhaps at www.fedoracommunity.org, with links to foo.fedoracommunity.org and fedoraproject.org/wiki/foo (or fp.o/foo or foo.fp.o) as appropriate. I can't see this as anything but win. My concern, [badly] expressed in the previous e-mail, is that we run the risk of fragmenting the community. "My stuff is under baz.fedoraproject.org, that's where *I* contribute" ... "There is no bar.fc.o, there must not be any Fedora activity in that country" ... "Oh, there's a good resource for NetworkManager, it's in the Estonian community site". I would much rather see us concentrate our efforts under the fp.o umbrella, and leave foo.fc.o for local initiatives (library rollouts, discussions of legislation which will touch open source, national installfests, wifi power/channel tables to comply with local regulations, localization sprints, ...) and for localized content. -Chris _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board