On 07/13/2010 10:35 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/09/2010 02:13 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> To clear up a couple things that I saw questions on in this thread: >> >> * The existence of fedoracommunity.org is, in part, premised on >> relieving our sponsor, Red Hat, of some risk. It's the same kind of >> risk that requires our wiki to avoid giving out specific information >> on the dreaded $ZOMG_CODECS. To paraphrase my discussions with Red >> Hat Legal that led to our creating this domain, the very domain name >> itself helps indicate that "the Fedora Project" (not an actual legal >> entity, so it's fair to read this as "Red Hat," since Daddy >> Shadowman assumes all our legal risks [thanks!]) is not responsible >> for the content at a target site. >> > > To be direct, If fedoracommunity.org wiki documents the steps to use RPM > Fusion, is that ok according to Red Hat Legal? Red Hat does not control (or condone) the content of fedoracommunity.org. ~spot _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
