Hi! On 31.03.2010 19:06, inode0 wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Well, let me ask this -- are answers simply gathered by having the >> candidates edit the wiki page for the questionnaire? If so, there >> seems to be very little work required for that step. Larry, it seems >> to me that having people submit answers to you to just transfer to the >> wiki is not time well spent for anyone. >> >> Is there some reason we wouldn't want candidates to just put their >> answers on the wiki? I could be missing something here. > > I believe the original intent was to get independent answers from each > candidate. That independence is compromised if some candidates get to > read the answers that other candidates provide prior to their own > submissions. Correct, and I think that it was and is really an important thing (I for example lurked into answers from others in similar earlier elections and that influenced my answers quite a lot...). > It has from what I've gathered been a bit of work for the middleman in > the process in the past. Mostly because the instructions how to sent the answers were not good enough or because the instructions were not followed fully (that's the long story rough and short). If better ways can be found (maybe a really simple web app [private URL of course] witch stores the answers in a proper file formal might do the trick) then things could get a whole lot easier for the middle man. > [...] CU knurd _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
