On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, let me ask this -- are answers simply gathered by having the > candidates edit the wiki page for the questionnaire? If so, there > seems to be very little work required for that step. Larry, it seems > to me that having people submit answers to you to just transfer to the > wiki is not time well spent for anyone. > > Is there some reason we wouldn't want candidates to just put their > answers on the wiki? I could be missing something here. I believe the original intent was to get independent answers from each candidate. That independence is compromised if some candidates get to read the answers that other candidates provide prior to their own submissions. It has from what I've gathered been a bit of work for the middleman in the process in the past. I've asked myself more than once if this is worth continuing to do because in the past it has also been quite a lot of work for the candidates who choose to do it with care. The answers provided however have been so good and worth reading that without a revolt by the candidates I think it is worth doing. As a burden relief to everyone perhaps we should control the imposition level by not asking the candidates to answer too many questions in this format. People can always come to the town halls and ask as well. John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
