On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 08:56 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Dictating something from the top without bothering to ask those that are > effected by the decision(¹) imho isn't either. > > CU > knurd > > (¹) e.g. ask on fedora-devel-list for options before making the rules > official, as not everyone is on this list. And yes, I'm well aware that > doing that might yet again create a bumpy discussion, but in the end you > can at least say "okay, you wanted it like this" and "we gave you the > chance to come up with something better" ;-) Especially the latter is > something really important. Nearly, if not, all members of the board are also subscribers to the list. I think we're uniquely suited to gather opinions amongst our selves (as well as the community via f-a-b and the meeting minutes) about how we'd like to see the issue resolved. Remember, the board is made of many volunteers as well. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
