On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:56:06 -0800 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So here's an interesting ramification of this: third party spins that > aren't allowed to call themselves Fedora (because they add patented > OSS software, for instance), won't be able to participate in our > hosting program. So a solution that relies on our hosting the spins > won't address the needs of those people. > > I don't know if that's the target audience of the initial proposal, > though. I'm pretty sure we can get away with hosting them in some fashion, the same as sourceforge can get away with hosting projects that are of shady nature. It's not Fedora, it's not our product, we're just providing hosting. But yes, not a target of the initial offering. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
