On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:15:19 +0100 Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1) it's very clear > 2) downstream can point to sources hosted by the Fedora Project > 3) sources do not have to be stored 3 years, but (for example) a one > release lifecycle > > If possible, this certainly looks like a winner. Well, sources would need to be available for as long as downstreams have done a binary release based from those sources. Whether Fedora hosts those sources, or Fedora says they'll host those sources for a period of time and then retire them, at which point the downstream has to pick up the sources is debatable. Easier to manage if we provide hosting for as many downstreams as possible, at least the exploaded content so that hardlinks can be maximized. I don't know if distribution via v3 is even possible at this point, I'm just looking into the future. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
