On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:15:34 +0100 Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This branch in the discussion isn't my beef and I should stick to my > point; giving anyone enough freedom to do whatever it is they want to > do with Fedora, based on Fedora or rebranded FUbuntu for all I care, > without the legal responsibilities of having to host or distribute > the sources or creating any other type of overhead. No-one > (individuals and small projects in particular) should care about > GPL-compliance knowing that someone else has that area covered. This is likely the basis of our disagreement then. I don't feel comfortable resting that legal obligation with Fedora, especially as an afterthought. I'd prefer that if you wish to rely upon Fedora to foot your legal requirements, you participate in our hosting program so that Fedora can ensure an end in sight for our legal assumed responsibilities. Nothing should prevent a downstream from doing their own thing, not participating with Fedora project. I would just rather that if they choose to do this, that they also choose to handle their own legal responsibilities. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
