On 22.03.2007 13:31, Christian Iseli wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:00:50 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > To summarize my opinion: Just to note: it is IMHO a general thing -- the wiki move was only meant as an example. > I think reorganizing the wiki was a necessary > thing, and I'm glad and thankful Rahul did it. +1 > I'm aware he sent > messages to the list a while ago about the need to do a reorg. My only > kind request is as noted above: "send a shout on maintainers and/or > devel right *before* starting to do bold changes in the organizations", > where bold means it's going to affect more than a couple maintainers > and/or users. Something with a clear deadline so that people know they > have to react quickly if they have objections, e.g. "in a few hours > I'll start moving pages around in such and such way, please yell now or > keep your peace" and later "changes done", rather than "I just moved > pages around in such and such way, just so you know" +1 > No need for lengthy discussions in general. Just an advance warning > with a short deadline please. I'd say "short" should be at least 48 or 72 hours for a task that was controversial discussed without a outcome beforehand, as "simply doing stuff" otherwise looks like "I do it my way now without bothering what the others say". That would be bad IMHO for a community project. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
